MT>3
  • Home
  • About
  • People
  • Services
    • e-Discovery
    • Managed Review
    • Information Governance
    • Due Diligence
  • Blog
  • News
  • Contact

Did the Ontario Superior Court of Justice Endorse Predictive Coding (and nobody noticed)?

6/10/2016

 
In an innocuous dispute about reimbursement of legal fees, Justice Mesbur of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice implicitly accepts the benefits of predictive coding in reducing the costs of document review (the January 2016 unpublished decision is available on Lexis  - Bennett v. Bennett Environmental Inc., 2016 ONSC 503).

Bennett was facing fraud charges in the US, with indemnification for his legal fees provided by his employer, Bennett Environmental Inc.  The employer balked at when the fees claimed approached $4 million prior to the trial.  Responding to an interim bill of $2.8 million, the employer brought a motion and took issue with (among other things) the cost of document review.

Bennett’s legal team used predictive coding to conduct a first level review of the US DOJ’s huge “document dump” and then used higher priced law firm paralegals for second level review (rather than the up to $75/hr contract lawyers). The decision does not address the hourly rate of the paralegals, nor does it assess the quality and speed of document review conducted by firm paralegals as compared to professional document review contract lawyers.

Justice Mesbur concluded that “Given the use of predictive coding for the first level review of massive document disclosure, I do not find it unreasonable for the lawyer to then use paralegals to conduct the next level or levels of review”, and allows the full claim for the costs of the predictive coding and document review process.

To be fair, this is hardly an in-depth analysis of predictive coding.  While plaintiff’s criminal counsel did provide evidence on the rationale for the process employed (para 43), the details provided were rather thin:

          He testified, "Right, I think we used predicative algorithm coding software, which is generally less                     expensive. And we used various other methods to limit the document review that were less expensive           than human beings." He went on to say predictive coding was the first level review since it goes "a                     little deeper" than just a word search.

​Although we cannot yet declare that predictive coding has been accepted as the defacto best practice by Canadian courts, we see this as a step in the right direction.

One troubling aspect of the decision is the lack of commentary on keeping document review costs down by ensuring that reviewers are as efficient as possible.  Our experience is that ad hoc law firm review teams (firm lawyers or paralegals conscripted to review documents) are sometimes less efficient than an outsourced managed review with contract document review lawyers.  We don’t think that the court can be taken to suggest that firms can waste money on second level review if they save money with predictive coding on the first level.  In fact, we know that using predictive coding to save money pairs well with the savings generated by a properly managed review.

Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    Artificial Intelligence
    Blockchain
    Cyber Security
    E Discovery
    Information Governance
    Legaltech
    Privacy
    Social Media
    Technology


    Archives

    February 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    September 2017
    August 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    June 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    December 2008
    March 2008
    November 2007
    October 2007

130 Adelaide Street West Suite 2020
Toronto, Ontario M5H 3P5
​ ​
t: 416-642-2220  
tf: 1-877-642-2220  
f: 416-868-0673
Contact MT>3
@MT>3 2018. All Rights Reserved
Picture

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

  • Home
  • About
  • People
  • Services
    • e-Discovery
    • Managed Review
    • Information Governance
    • Due Diligence
  • Blog
  • News
  • Contact