MT>3
  • Home
  • About
  • People
  • Services
    • e-Discovery
    • Managed Review
    • Information Governance
    • Due Diligence
  • Blog
  • News
  • Contact

Hot Off The Bench: e-Discovery and Privilege      (Part One)

27/3/2013

 
​Electronically stored information continually changes the nature and process of discovery. It also brings into focus various aspects of substantive law, including the issue of privilege.

On March 25, 2013, Master Macleod released his reasons in the case of Kaymar Rehabilitation Inc. and Champlain Community Care Access Centre, 2013 ONSC 1754. The primary issues before him were: 1) the existence and duration of litigation privilege and 2) whether privilege that arose in previous proceedings in another forum continued to apply (the litigation case had related administrative proceedings). All of the disputed records were emails.

After re-affirming the “virtually sacrosanct” nature of solicitor client privilege (para. 45), the court’s analysis turned to litigation privilege, summarized as follows:

a. The dominant purpose test continues to be the cornerstone of evaluating litigation privilege;
b. The purpose of the privilege is to allow a necessary zone of privacy to preserve a party’s litigation strategy;
c. Litigation privilege includes settlement strategy, mediation, pre-trial or settlement meetings;
d. It ends once the purpose it was intended to serve is over;
e. If subsequent litigation is essentially a continuation of the “same legal combat” (despite different parties) and the privileged record relates to the strategy in the new litigation, the privilege should survive;
f. Litigation privilege may (but will not automatically) survive between proceedings in various forums (administrative proceedings, arbitration, litigation). In all cases, the court will examine closely the purpose for which a record was created, and the purpose served by permitted its continued suppression. (para. 63)


Ultimately, the court applied these rules to a collection of emails, making specific findings on each. As a result, this is a valuable decision in terms of evaluating privilege calls in a contextual way.


​In Part Two we will examine Master Macleod’s commentary on the parties’ Discovery Plan and whether court inspection of disputed documents remains a viable procedure in the electronic age.

Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    Artificial Intelligence
    Blockchain
    Cyber Security
    E Discovery
    Information Governance
    Legaltech
    Privacy
    Social Media
    Technology


    Archives

    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    September 2017
    August 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    June 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    December 2008
    March 2008
    November 2007
    October 2007

130 Adelaide Street West Suite 2020
Toronto, Ontario M5H 3P5
​ ​
t: 416-642-2220  
tf: 1-877-642-2220  
f: 416-868-0673
Contact MT>3
@MT>3 2018. All Rights Reserved
Picture

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

  • Home
  • About
  • People
  • Services
    • e-Discovery
    • Managed Review
    • Information Governance
    • Due Diligence
  • Blog
  • News
  • Contact