MT>3
  • Home
  • About
  • People
  • Services
    • e-Discovery
    • Managed Review
    • Information Governance
    • Due Diligence
  • Blog
  • News
  • Contact

Playing Cat and Mouse with Preservation Orders

1/9/2016

 
Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v. Moyse is a good example of getting what you ask for. In this case, the Ontario Superior Court considered whether the defendant, Moyse, who deleted his Internet browsing history from his personal computer in the face of a preservation order, had intentionally destroyed relevant evidence (also called spoliation).

In Moyse, the defendant had allegedly shared Catalyst’s (his former employer) confidential information with his subsequent employer, West Face.  Before turning his personal computer over to his lawyer pursuant to the order requiring him to maintain records relevant to the litigation, Moyse employed the use of deletion tools to wipe his Internet browsing history.  He asserted that his browsing history was irrelevant personal information. Catalyst argued that Moyse’s intentional deletion of his Internet browsing history was evidence of spoliation.

Moyse testified he was only trying to protect his personal information, and that the preservation order did not require that he maintain his computer in ‘as is’ condition. The court accepted Moyse’s explanation and found that based on the facts of the case there was insufficient evidence to merit a finding of spoliation.
Catalyst could have saved considerable time and expense with a clearly drafted preservation order. Had the order provided that Moyse turn over his computer in the same condition as it was on the date the order was made, either a) the forensic experts would have been easily able to determine whether the computer contained any incriminating information, b) Moyse would have nevertheless deleted the files thus destroying his credibility, or c) the forensic experts would have discovered that there was in fact nothing nefarious on Moyse’s personal computer, and the entire debate would have been avoided.

​In the cat and mouse game of litigation, precision matters.   If you are going to the effort of getting a preservation order, make sure that there is no room for interpretation.  In this case, if Catalyst had properly baited the trap, they may well have caught Moyse.

Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    Artificial Intelligence
    Blockchain
    Cyber Security
    E Discovery
    Information Governance
    Legaltech
    Privacy
    Social Media
    Technology


    Archives

    February 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    September 2017
    August 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    June 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    December 2008
    March 2008
    November 2007
    October 2007

130 Adelaide Street West Suite 2020
Toronto, Ontario M5H 3P5
​ ​
t: 416-642-2220  
tf: 1-877-642-2220  
f: 416-868-0673
Contact MT>3
@MT>3 2018. All Rights Reserved
Picture

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

  • Home
  • About
  • People
  • Services
    • e-Discovery
    • Managed Review
    • Information Governance
    • Due Diligence
  • Blog
  • News
  • Contact